4.7 Article

Optimization of a scanner imaging technique to accurately study oil migration kinetics

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 368-373

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2008.12.017

Keywords

Image analysis; Oil migration kinetics; Confectionery products; Models of diffusion

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to refine an image analysis technique that was developed in our laboratory in order to study oil migration in confectionery products (Marty, S., Baker, K., Dibildox-Alvarado, E., Neves Rodrigues, J., & Marangoni, A. G. (2005). Monitoring and quantifying of oil migration in cocoa butter using a flatbed scanner and fluorescence light microscopy. Food Research International). The migration of a nile red stained oily phase (soft fat) was monitored in tempered cocoa butter matrices kept at 18 degrees C for about 75 days. Oil migration kinetics was quantified using a common flatbed scanner followed by image processing and analysis. The most reliable parameter derived from this analysis is the position of the dye front (I-10) where the intensity of the dye is 10% of maximum. The determination of the amount of dye migrated from pixel intensity measurements was found to be highly affected by cocoa butter structure at times greater than 28 days. but I-10 was not. The determination of a model-independent oil migration rate (I-10/t(n)) using this method was found to be highly reproducible and accurate. Due to the observed non-linearity of the oil migration process and the effects of matrix structure on the determination of pixel intensity (and thus mass of dye migrated), the quantification of oil migration using the simplified version of Fick's second law is not recommended. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available