4.6 Article

Stability of market segmentation with cluster analysis - A methodological approach

Journal

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 70-78

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.12.004

Keywords

Market segmentation; Cluster analysis; Reliability; Validity; Stability over time; Panel survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Market segmentation is a very popular marketing tool. In the food sector, the characteristics of different consumer attitudes and consumption habits are often used as the basis for segmentation. However, the success of a target-oriented marketing approach to selected groups of consumers depends on the results of the methodology applied. So far, relatively little attention has been paid to the reliability of the analysis used for attitude-based market segmentation, to the validity or internal stability of results or to the dynamic stability over time with regard to number, size and properties of the segments. In our study, we used data from a panel of more than 10,000 German households. The participants were segmented using a statement battery and the application of cluster analysis. In order to ensure an internally stable cluster solution, our focus was on the analytical and technical process of decision making when clustering a large dataset. A combination of various statistical measures was applied in order to enable objective decision making in the determination of the optimal number of clusters. The dynamic stability of the resulting segments was determined by confirmatory cluster analyses using data from the same individuals in three subsequent years. The results of the analyses show that neither the internal nor the dynamic stability of market segments should be taken for granted. Therefore, marketers face the challenge of designing segment-specific marketing strategies in a way that allows changes in consumer preferences to be integrated. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available