4.7 Article

Molecular methods used to estimate thermal inactivation of a prototype human norovirus: More heat resistant than previously believed?

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 91-95

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.01.009

Keywords

Human norovirus; Thermal inactivation; Heat resistance

Funding

  1. Merieux Alliance group through the Merieux Research Grant Program
  2. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2010-51110-21080, 2011-68003-30395]
  3. NIFA [580622, 2010-51110-21080] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two molecular-based methods for estimating capsid integrity as a proxy for virus infectivity were used to produce thermal inactivation profiles of Snow Mountain virus (SMV), a prototype human norovirus (HuNoV). Monodispersed virus suspensions were exposed to 77, 80, 82 and 85 degrees C for various times, pre-treated with either propidium monoazide (PMA) or RNase, and subjected to RNA isolation followed by RT-qPCR amplification. D-values were 25.6 +/- 2.8, 3.1 +/- 0.1, 0.7 +/- 0.04 and 0.2 +/- 0.07 min at 77, 80, 82 and 85 degrees C, respectively for PMA-treated SMV; and 16.4 +/- 0.4, 3.9 +/- 0.2 0.9 +/- 0.3 and 0.12 +/- 0.00 min at 77, 80, 82 and 85 degrees C, respectively for RNase-treated SMV. Corresponding z(D) values were 3.80 degrees C and 3.71 degrees C for PMA and RNase-treated virus, respectively. Electron microscopy data applied to heat-treated virus-like particles supported this relatively high degree of thermal resistance. The data suggest that SMV is more heat resistant than common cultivable HuNoV surrogates. Standardized thermal inactivation methods (such as milk pasteurization) may not be stringent enough to eliminate this virus and perhaps other HuNoV. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available