4.7 Article

Identification of meat-associated pathogens via Raman microspectroscopy

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages 36-43

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2013.08.007

Keywords

Food-borne pathogens; Raman microspectroscopy; Support vector machine; Three level classification model; Minced beef; Chicken breast

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany [FKZ 13N11168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of fast and reliable sensing techniques to detect food-borne microorganisms is a permanent concern in food industry and health care. For this reason, Raman microspectroscopy was applied to rapidly detect pathogens in meat, which could be a promising supplement to currently established methods. In this context, a spectral database of 19 species of the most important harmful and non-pathogenic bacteria associated with meat and poultry was established. To create a meat-like environment the microbial species were prepared on three different agar types. The whole amount of Raman data was taken as a basis to build up a three level classification model by means of support vector machines. Subsequent to a first classifier that differentiates between Raman spectra of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, two decision knots regarding bacterial genus and species follow. The different steps of the classification model achieved accuracies in the range of 90.6%-99.5%. This database was then challenged with independently prepared test samples. By doing so, beef and poultry samples were spiked with different pathogens associated with food-borne diseases and then identified. The test samples were correctly assigned to their genus and for the most part down to the species-level i.e. a differentiation from closely-related non-pathogenic members was achieved. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available