4.7 Article

Variation of cardinal growth parameters and growth limits according to phylogenetic affiliation in the Bacillus cereus Group. Consequences for risk assessment

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 69-76

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.08.014

Keywords

Bacillus cereus; Phylogeny; Cardinal temperature; Cardinal pH; Cardinal a(w); Predictive microbiology; Risk assessment; Growth limit

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) (France) [ANR-05-PNRA-013]
  2. Programme Assistants-Boursiers of the France-Syria cooperation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growth rates of strains covering the seven major phylogenetic groups of Bacillus cereus sensu lato (as defined by Guinebretiere et al., 2008) at a range of temperature (7 degrees C-55 degrees C), pH (4.6-7.5) and a(w) (0.929-0.996, with 0.5%-10% NaCl as humectant) were determined. Growth rates were fitted by non-linear regression to determine the cardinal parameters T-min, T-opt, T-max, pH(min), pH(opt), a(wmin) and mu(opt). We showed that cardinal parameters reflected the differences in the temperature adaptation observed between B. cereus phylogenetic groups I to VII. The ability of growing at low pH (up to 4.3) or low a(w) (from a(w) 0.929 and up to 10% NaCl) varied among strains. The strains of groups III and VII, the most tolerant to heat, were also the most adapted to high NaCl (all strains growing at 8% NaCl) and the ones of groups I and VI the least adapted (no growth at 7% NaCl). All strains of groups II and VII were able to grow at pH 4.6, and only a few strains of group VI. Phenotypic differences between the two psychrotrophic groups II and VI were revealed by contrasted acid and salt tolerance. The cardinal values determined in this work were validated by comparing with cardinal parameters of a panel of strains published elsewhere and with predictions of growth in a range of foods. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available