4.7 Article

Application of propidium monoazide-qPCR to evaluate the ultrasonic inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in fresh-cut vegetable wash water

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 316-320

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.10.008

Keywords

Enterohemorrhagic E. coli; Ultrasound; Propidium monoazide; Fresh-cut vegetables

Funding

  1. MICINN [AGL2009-08603]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [ACOMP/2010/279]
  3. CSIC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficacy of sanitizing technologies in produce or in vegetable wash water is generally evaluated by plate count in selective media. This procedure is time consuming and can lead to misinterpretations because environmental conditions and sanitizing processes may affect bacterial growth or culturable capability. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the applicability of a propidium monoazide real-time PCR (PMA-qPCR) method to monitor the inactivation by ultrasound treatment of foodborne bacteria in fresh-cut vegetable wash water. To this aim, lettuce wash water was artificially inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 (10(6) CFU/mL) and treated by means of a continuous ultrasonic irradiation with a power density of 0.280 kW/L. Quantification data obtained by PMA-qPCR and plate counts were statistically similar during the viability reduction of 99.996% which corresponds to 4.4 log reductions. Further reductions of E. coli 0157:H7 were not detected by the PMA-qPCR method due to the limit of detection of this technique (20 CFU/mL). Inactivation data obtained by both techniques successfully fitted a linear model, giving no significant differences in kinetic parameters. These results indicate that the PMA-qPCR method is a suitable technique for evaluating ultrasonic disinfection of vegetable wash water, being able to distinguish between live and dead bacteria. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available