4.7 Review

Application of Lactobacillus fermentum HL57 and Pediococcus acidilactici SP979 as potential probiotics in the manufacture of traditional Iberian dry-fermented sausages

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 839-847

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.01.006

Keywords

L fermentum HL57; P. acidilactici SP979; Probiotics; Iberian dry-fermented sausages

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of implanting the probiotics Lactobacillus fermentum HL57 and P. acidilactici SP979 during manufacture of Iberian dry-fermented sausages, and their effect on the sensory properties of these meat products. Microbial counts were studied in sausages inoculated with these strains and compared with a control batch. To detect the presence of probiotic strains at high counts (>7 log CFU/g) in the inoculated sausages, specific PCR and (RAPD)-PCR techniques were carried out. Changes due to probiotic inoculations on parameters and compounds related to fermentation, and nitrogen and lipid fractions were determined, and the impact on sensory quality evaluated by descriptive and hedonic tests. Iberian dry-fermented sausages inoculated with L fermentum HL57 and P. acidilactici SP979 may be considered as functional products according to the counts of these strains found at the end of processing. However, inoculation with L fermentum HL57 increased the amount of acetic acid and lipid degradation products such as malonaldehyde in Iberian dry-fermented sausages, resulting in a negative impact on relevant sensory parameters related to colour and taste. On the contrary, P. acidilactici SP979 did not notably modify the physicochemical parameters or the sensory quality of Iberian dry-fermented sausages when compared to the autochthonous microbial population present in the control batch. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available