4.7 Article

Introduction of broad spectrum antibacterial properties to bacterial cellulose nanofibers via immobilising ε-polylysine nanocoatings

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages 204-211

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.09.015

Keywords

Bacterial cellulose; epsilon-Polylysine; Procyanidins; Active packaging

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51172158, 81200663]
  2. Science and Technology Support Program of Tianjin [11ZCKFSY01700]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Active packaging plays a role of a barrier to the outside environment to protect food products. The bacterial cellulose (BC) has the potential as active packaging for food due to its high purity of cellulose content and refined nanofibrous network structure mainly. In order to enhance the antibacterial activity of BC, the epsilon-polylysine (EPL), a natural coming peptide applied as safe food preservative, was introduced to the surfaces of BC nanofibers via crosslinking method by using procyanidins as crosslinker. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Fourier Transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), were employed to characterize the structure of BC/EPL composite nanofibers. SEM and TEM observations revealed that EPL coatings on the surfaces of BC nanofibers were composed of EPL nanoparticles and the thickness of EPL coatings was proportional to the concentration of EPL solution. FTIR results indicated that -NH3+ groups were preserved after crosslinking process and the introduction of EPL had no influence on the original chemical structure of BC. In addition, BC/EPL composite nanofibers exhibited antibacterial activity against both Escherichia coli (Gram-negative bacteria) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive bacteria). The antibacterial activity was enhanced with the increase of concentration of EPL solution. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available