4.7 Article

Impact of viscous dietary fibres on the viscoelastic behaviour of gluten-free formulated rice doughs: A fundamental and empirical rheological approach

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 252-262

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.01.014

Keywords

Gluten-free; Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose; beta-Glucan; Dough rheology

Funding

  1. Spanish Institutions Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [AGL2012-35088, AGL2011-22669]
  2. Comunidad de Castilla y Leon [VA252A12-2]
  3. laboratory of Pharmacy [ISO 17025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The significance of the incorporation of associated viscous dietary fibres (hydroxypropylmethylcellulose semi-firm - SFE - and weak - NE - gel like forming, and barley beta-glucan, BBG) at different amounts (1.6e7.5%, flour basis) into gluten-free rice-based dough formulations, on the rheological profile of hydrated (70-110%, flour basis) fibre-flour composite blends has been investigated. A dual fundamental (dynamic oscillatory and creep-recovery tests) and empirical (consistency, and viscometric profile) rheological approach was adopted to assess the viscoelasticity of fibre-enriched rice-based dough matrices. Retrieved functional variables were analyzed for dependence on dough hydration and on viscous dietary fibres, and for correlations within parameters from both small and large deformation tests. The water competition of fibre macromolecules expliciting different water binding and gelling abilities resulted in additive, synergistic and/or antagonistic effects on major rheological features. Higher consistent doughs corresponded to those with larger dynamic moduli with poorer frequency dependence, lower elastic deformation at a constant stress, and higher viscosity at steady state. In addition, doughs exhibiting higher viscous component (oscillatory dynamic test) showed concomitantly lower viscosity profiles during cooking (mimetic viscometric test). (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available