4.7 Article

Fabrication, characterization, and cytotoxicity evaluation of cranberry procyanidins-zein nanoparticles

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 293-300

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.10.002

Keywords

Procyanidin; Zein; Nanoparticle; Cranberry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cranberry procyanidins (CPs)-zein nanoparticles were fabricated using a modified liquid-liquid dispersion method. The CPs were purified using chromatographic methods and analyzed using HPLC equipped with a fluorescence detector (FLD) and mass spectrometer (MS). The purified CPs had a purity of 64.7% (w/w) and contained procyanidin oligomers (from dimers to decamers) and polymers, with polymers being the predominant component (38.7%, w/w). The particle size of the CPs-zein nanoparticles increased from 392 nm to 447 nm with the increase of the CPs-to-zein mass ratios from 1: 8 to 1:2. Morphologically, the CPs-zein nanoparticles were spherical as observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The loading efficiency of CPs in the CPs-zein nanoparticles decreased with an increase of CPs-to-zein mass ratios from 1: 8 to 1: 2, and ranged from 10% to 86%. The oligomers with higher degree of polymerization (DP) showed higher loading efficiency than the oligomers with lower DP, suggesting a greater binding affinity on zein proteins. The loading capacity of the CPs-zein nanoparticles fabricated using a high CPs-to-zein mass ratio (1: 2) was significantly higher than those using a low mass ratio (1: 8). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) suggested that the primary interactions between the CPs and zein were hydrogen bond and hydrophobic interactions. Cell culture studies using human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells showed that the CPs encapsulated in nanoparticles had decreased cytotoxicity compared to the CPs. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available