4.7 Article

Lubricating properties of human whole saliva as affected by β-lactoglobulin

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1499-1506

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.021

Keywords

Astringency; Saliva; Lubrication; Whey proteins; Tribology

Funding

  1. USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service (CSREES) [2006-35503-17066]
  2. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service
  3. Southeast Dairy Food Research Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of beta-lactoglobulin (beta-LG) at pH 3.5 and 7.0 on lubricating property of saliva as related to astringency perception was investigated using tribology. Saliva was adsorbed onto surfaces of a rotating poly dimethylsiloxane (PDMS) ball and disc to form a film under conditions that mimic the rubbing contacts in the oral cavity (Bongaerts, Rossetti, & Stokes, 2007) and the lubricity of saliva films upon exposure to astringent compounds was measured. While addition of non-astringent beta-LG at pH 7.0 slowly increased friction of saliva film between tribopair surfaces, beta-LG at pH 3.5 rapidly increased the friction coefficients of saliva, similar to other astringent compounds (epigallocatechin gallate and alum). This supports the hypothesis that astringency of beta-LG arises from the loss of lubrication of saliva which is in agreement with the well-accepted astringency model of polyphenols. Increasing beta-LG concentration at pH 3.5 (0.5-10% w/w) caused a rapid increase in friction coefficient; however, at the highest protein concentration, the friction coefficient, although higher than observed for water, was below the values observed for the lower protein concentrations. This suggests that static tribology testing is different from the dynamic in-mouth system such that a simple relationship between friction and sensory astringency cannot be found for all conditions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available