4.7 Article

Physicochemical properties and structure of starches from Chinese rice cultivars

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 24, Issue 2-3, Pages 208-216

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.09.007

Keywords

China rice starches; Physicochemical properties; Thermal properties; Rheological properties; Structure; Isoamylase

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science & Technology of China [2006BAD27B09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Starches from 10 different non-waxy rice cultivars in China were isolated and investigated for their physicochemical properties including the swelling power, solubility, syneresis, thermal, rheological and textural properties, and structure. The range of amylose content in 10 rice starches was between 18.1 and 31.6%. The branch chain length distribution of amylopectin revealed that the proportions of short (DP6-11), medium (DP12-17), and longer chains (DP18-23) were 4.6-11.1%, 47.0-51.6% and 25.3-31.8%, respectively. The relationships between different properties of rice starches were determined using Pearson correlation analysis. Amylose content was negatively correlated to swelling power (r = -0.632, p <= 0.05) and positively correlated to gel hardness (r = 0.776, p <= 0.01). The percentage of short chains (DP6-11) was negatively related to the transition temperatures (T-o, T-p and T-c), T-oG' and T-G'max, while the percentage of medium chains (DP12-23) was positively related. Various branch chain length amylopectins played different roles in rheological behavior of starch dispersions. The percentage of short chains (DP6-11) was positively correlated to G' and G ''(r = 0.832 and r = 0.775, respectively, p <= 0.01), and negatively correlated to tan delta peak (r = -0.717, p <= 0.05). However, the percentage of longer chains (DP18-23) showed a negative relation with G' and G '' (r = -0.794, p <= 0.01; r = -0.741, p <= 0.05), and a positive relation with tan delta peak (r = -0.668, p <= 0.05). (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available