4.7 Article

The influence of hydrophobic substances on water vapor permeability of fish gelatin films modified with transglutaminase or 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 1062-1064

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.08.002

Keywords

Fish gelatin; Hydrophobic substances; Transglutaminase (TGase); 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC); Water vapor permeability (WVP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of different hydrophobic Substances on water vapor permeability (WVP) of unmodified fish gelatin films and cross-linked with transglutaminase (TGase) or with 1-ethyl -3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) was determined. Both unmodified and cross-linked films were characterized by very poor water barrier properties. Amaranth oil, rapeseed oil, lanolin, beeswax and ozococerite at concentration of 10% decreased WVP of unmodified gelatin films by 42, 15, 37, 53 and 36%, respectively. Increasing concentration of these substances up to 60% caused further improving of the water barrier properties. Addition of lecithin into film-forming emulsions prevented separation of lipid layer on the film surface. Among unmodified films with lecithin and 60% of lipids the highest decrease of WVP was found in case of amaranth oil and beeswax, by 73 and 87%, respectively, in comparison to only-gelatin films. WVP of chemically modified films in the presence of 60% of beeswax with addition of lecithin was decreased by about 65%. Enzymatically modified films with beeswax were very brittle and broke during analyzes, similarly as those with amaranth oil and lecithin. WVP of enzymatically modified films with lecithin and 60% of rapeseed oil and lanolin was respectively, about 60 and 47% lower than that of films without hydrophobic substances. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available