4.7 Article

FTIR spectra studies on the secondary structures of 7S and 11S globulins from soybean proteins using AOT reverse micellar extraction

Journal

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 568-575

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.01.019

Keywords

FTIR; reverse micelle; soybean; 7S and 11S globulins; secondary structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) method Was used to study the secondary structures of 7S and 11S globulins from soybean proteins using aqueous buffer and reverse micelles extraction method for the first time. The Fourier second derivative was applied to all spectra, revealing that the amideband of 7S and 11S globulins with two extraction methods consisted of eight bands. The I band frequencies were assigned to alpha-helix, beta-sheet, unordered and turn structure. The second derivative spectra of 7S and 11S globulins had been shifted with reverse micellar extraction method compared with their spectra with aqueous buffer extraction method. The relative amount of different structure of 7S and 11S globulins could be estimated through accurate measurement of the band intensities. The results indicated that the percentage of 7S globulin alpha-helix and beta-sheet, turn structures decreased with the reverse micelles extraction (7S globulin: 14.5% alpha-helix, 45.6% beta-sheet, 14.4% unordered, 23.8% turn; 11S globulin: 17.0% alpha-helix, 47.3% beta-sheet, 16.5% unordered., 19.3% turn), compared with 7S (16.5%; alpha-helix, 47.6% beta-sheet, 35.9% turn) and 11S (17.0% alpha-helix, 47.3% beta-sheet, 35.8% turn) globulins by the aqueous buffer extraction, while the percentage of 11S globulin alpha-helix and beta-sheet structures did not change. The percentage of unordered structure was 14.4 and 16.5, respectively. The amount change of these substructures might affect functional properties of 7S and 11S globulins. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available