4.7 Article

Patulin assessment and fungi identification in organic and conventional fruits and derived products

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 185-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.03.043

Keywords

Patulin; Apple products; Tomato products; Fungi identification; DNA barcoding; Contaminants

Funding

  1. European Union (FEDER funds through COMPETE)
  2. National Funds (FCT, Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia) [Pest-C/EQB/LA0006/2013]
  3. European Union (FEDER funds) [NORTE-07-0124-FEDER-000069]
  4. consortium University of Porto/Santander Totta
  5. Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON.2 - O Novo Norte), from Quadro de Referencia Estrategico Nacional (QREN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, patulin levels in apples and tomatoes obtained in conventional and organic farms with 0 and 100% of rotten area, were determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to assess the influence of the production system with patulin content. Additionally, mould species were isolated and identified using classic morphological techniques and a DNA barcode system based on nrITS, beta-tubulin and calmodulin genes. The most frequently isolated genera were Rhizopus, Mucor, Alternaria, Cladosporium, Botrytis, Aspergillus and Penicillium. Higher patulin levels were found in samples contaminated by Penicillium expansum. Patulin levels were not significantly different in samples obtained from the two production system (conventional and organic). Among the three studied apple varieties, Golden delicious was the most contaminated with patulin followed by Reineta. Fuji apples with 0 and 100% of rotten area did not present quantifiable patulin levels. A survey for first time realized in commercialized tomato products showed that 35.7% of the samples (10 of 28) contained patulin in levels ranging from 3.22 to 47.72 mu g/kg. In apple juices, patulin levels ranged from 1.86 to 45.47 mu g/kg, which is below the maximum legal requirement (50 mu g/kg). (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available