4.7 Article

Multi-detection of mycotoxins by membrane based flow-through immunoassay

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 462-469

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.05.036

Keywords

Rapid test; Mycotoxin; Multi-assay; Immunoassay; Food and feed analysis

Funding

  1. Special Research Fund Ghent University [01SB3210]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [12-03-92699]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A membrane-based flow-through immunoassay for rapid non-instrumental multi-detection of ochratoxin A (OTA), zearalenone (ZEN) and fumonisin B1 (FB1) in cereal grains and silage was developed. The test is based on a direct competitive enzyme immunoassay performed on a membrane. Alkaline phosphatase was used as enzyme label to decrease matrix interference. The analytical method involved a fast extraction procedure (extraction with a mixture of methanol, water and acetic acid 79:20:1, v/v) followed by a multi-detection. The immunotest allows the visual estimation of the presence of three mycotoxins in less than 15 min. The cut-off limit of this test have been set at a value not higher than half of EU legislative limits (2.5, 50 and 1000 mu g kg(-1) for OTA, ZEN and FB1 correspondingly in wheat; 2.5, 100 and 1000 mu g kg(-1) in maize; 25, 125 and 2500 mu g kg(-1) in silage). Evaluation and validation studies have been performed using spiked and naturally contaminated samples and results were compared with LC-MS/MS. Also the possibility of analyte detection in wheat at two concentration levels by the immunotest was demonstrated with OTA and ZEN as an example. In spite of the semiquantitative-qualitative character of the test, the results demonstrate that the test provides a very good estimation of the mycotoxins concentration in wheat, maize and silage. This test format could be adapted to the multi-detection of other contaminants in food and feed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available