4.7 Article

Multimycotoxin analysis of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Garten) from Ethiopia

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 29-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.04.018

Keywords

Aspergillus; Finger millet; Fusarium; Liquid chromatography; Mycotoxins; Sorghum

Funding

  1. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD)
  2. MycoRed [KBBE-2007-22269-2]
  3. Federal Country Lower Austria
  4. European Regional Development Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The natural contamination of sorghum and finger millet by toxigenic fungi and associated mycotoxins has been studied. All the tested sorghum and finger millet samples were found to be contaminated by Fusarium and Aspergillus species. Sorghum was considerably more likely to be contaminated by both genera than finger millet. Penicillium, Alternaria, Rhizopus and Epicoccum species were also present in both grains albeit at lower frequencies. Multimycotoxin analysis using LC-MS/MS revealed the contamination of sorghum and finger millet by 84 and 62 metabolites, respectively. The prevalence of major mycotoxins was lower than 15% in sorghum except zearalenone that occurred in one third of the samples at average level of 44 mu g/kg. In finger millet major mycotoxins occurred at a prevalence of 6-52% with zearalenone being the dominant and occurring at average level of 76 mu g/kg. Aflatoxins B-1, B-2, G(1), G(2) and M-1 were detected in at least one sorghum sample while only aflatoxins B-1 and G(1) were present in finger millet samples. The average aflatoxins B-1 and G(1) concentrations in sorghum have been higher than European standards. But the level of B-2, G(2) and M-1 in sorghum and that of B-1 and G(1) in finger millet have been lower. Apart from aflatoxin precursors and other Fusarium metabolites, a broad range of additional metabolites were detected in sorghum and finger millet. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available