4.7 Review

Development and validation of a method for the determination of sulfonamides in animal feed by modified QuEChERS and LC-MS/MS analysis

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 192-198

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.026

Keywords

Animal feed; Sulfonamides; QuEChERS; HPLC-MS/MS

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (gs1) (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (gs2) (FAPEMIG)
  3. Ministerio da Agricultura, Pecuaria e Abastecimento (gs3) (MAPA) - Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A multiresidue method for the quantification of 13 sulfonamides in animal feed is described. It involves the application of a modified QuEChERS procedure followed by HPLC-MS/MS (high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry) analysis. The best conditions for the extraction solution and PSA (primary secondary amine) mass were determined. After optimization, the method was validated according to the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. The validation levels employed were 25, 50 and 75 mu g kg(-1). Acceptable values were obtained for the following parameters: linearity (0.9864 < r(2) < 0.9993), decision limit (50.4 mu g kg(-1) < CC alpha < 55.8 mu g kg(-1)), detection capability (50.7 mu g kg(-1) < CC beta < 55.8 mu g kg(-1)), limit of quantification (0.9 mu g kg(-1) < LOQ < 7.1 mu g kg(-1)), accuracy (86.0 < recovery rates < 106.8), precision [(3.6 < repeatability < 19.5), (5.5 < intermediate precision < 21.6)], measurement uncertainty (MU) (4.1 < MU < 32.6) and selectivity. These findings met the Codex requirements, which allow for the routine use of the method by the laboratories linked to the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply of Brazil. Finally, the method was applied to real samples and only one of them showed positive for sulfamethazine, however, with a concentration below the LOQ of the method. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available