4.7 Article

Cook-serve method in mass catering establishments: Is it still appropriate to ensure a high level of microbiological quality and safety?

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages 1844-1850

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.04.024

Keywords

Cook-serve method; Catering; Food safety; Water quality; Food contact surfaces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hygienic quality of three traditional cook-serve catering establishments in Lombardy, Italy (with an output ranging from 800 to 1700 meals a day), by monitoring the microbiological quality and safety of foods ready for consumption (n = 727), tap water (n = 32), microfiltered drinking water (n = 28), food contact surfaces (n = 280), and food handlers (n = 76). The food contact surfaces showed unacceptable contamination in 17.1% of samples. The hygienic level of the washed hands of food workers was very high, since only 1.3% of samples showed unacceptable contamination. Food sample analyses highlighted a percentage of samples that did not conform to microbial reference standards: the presence of Listeria monocytogenes was found in 11.5% of soft cheese samples. Staphylococcus aureus non-conforming percentages ranged from 2.2% for first and second courses to 34.6% for soft cheeses; Escherichia coli, from 2.7% for raw vegetables to 7.7% for soft cheeses: total coliforms from 6.7% for first and second courses to 76.4% for raw vegetables. The results of the water analysis indicated a high frequency of contamination with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21.4% for microfiltered drinking water and 21.9% for tap water samples). In conclusion, the results suggest that more effort should be made in the application of HACCP principles. In addition in order to ensure a higher level of microbiological safety of meals, various changes in the timing of food preparation and holding temperatures are needed. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available