4.7 Article

Phenolic composition of grape and winemaking by-products of Brazilian hybrid cultivars BRS Violeta and BRS Lorena

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 159, Issue -, Pages 95-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.02.163

Keywords

Anthocyanins; Pyranoanthocyanins; Phenolic acids; Flavonols; Condensed tannins; Grape marc; Lees; Non-vinifera grape

Funding

  1. National Council for the Improvement of Higher Education (CAPES)
  2. Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
  3. Fondo Social Europeo
  4. Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha [POII10-0061-4432]
  5. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [AGL2011-29708-C02-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phenolic composition of grapes and winemaking by-products (skins from grape marc, and lees) from Brazilian hybrid cultivars BRS Violeta (red) and BRS Lorena (white) was studied. Two vintages, five classes of phenolic compounds, and recovery yields using three dehydration techniques were considered: oven-drying at 50 degrees C (D-50); spray-drying (SD); and freeze-drying (FD). Recovery yields were higher using FD, although less expensive SD was a good alternative for Violeta lees. D50 caused great recovery reduction in Violeta but yielded similar results for Lorena. Violeta winemaking by-products were excellent sources of anthocyanins (mainly non-acylated and p-coumaroylated diglucosides), flavonols (mainly myricetin-based) and hydroxycinnamic derivatives (mainly caffeic-based). Lorena winemaking by-products contained lesser amounts of phenolic compounds, around a tenth of the values found in Violeta grapes for flavonols (mainly quercetin-based), hydroxycinnamic derivatives (mainly caffeic-based) and condensed tannins. Lorena cultivar contained small amounts of trans-resveratrol and its 3-glucoside, which were missing in Violeta cultivar. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available