4.7 Article

Sterols and triterpene diols in olive oil as indicators of variety and degree of ripening

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 136, Issue 1, Pages 251-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.005

Keywords

Olive oil; Sterols; Triterpene diols; Variety; Ripening degree; Storage; Multivariate statistics

Funding

  1. Ministry of science, education and sport of the Republic of Croatia is a part of research project Characterization of autochthonous olive varieties in Istria [147-0000000-3605]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sterols and triterpene diols in olive oil as indicators of variety and degree of ripening derived from three olive varieties and produced at three different harvesting periods were studied. In order to test the stability of the proposed indicators, oils obtained were stored for 12 months at three different temperatures. Thirty-six samples in total were subjected to GC analysis and results were processed by multivariate chemometric methods (MANOVA, PCA, and SLDA). Campesterol, beta-sitosterol, Delta(7)-campesterol/Delta(5,24)-stigmastadienol, clerosterol, uvaol, and campestanol/Delta(7)-avenasterol were established as the indicators of variety of fresh oils, while when stored oils were included in the model, the final three compounds were substituted by 24-methylene-cholesterol/stigmasterol. The most important variables for differentiating fresh oils according to degree of ripening were Delta(7)-campesterol/beta-sitosterol, uvaol/stigmasterol, clerosterol/Delta(5)-avenasterol and sitostanol/uvaol, while stored oils were differentiated by campestanol/stigmasterol, erythrodiol, stigmasterol/Delta(7)-campesterol, Delta(5)-avenasterol, 24-methylene-cholesterol/beta-sitosterol and 24-methylene-cholesterol. Results demonstrated that sterols and triterpene diols can be used as indicators of variety and degree of ripening among virgin olive oils. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available