4.7 Article

Differential changes in grain ultrastructure, amylase, protein and amino acid profiles between Tibetan wild and cultivated barleys under drought and salinity alone and combined stress

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages 2743-2750

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.101

Keywords

Amino acid; Starch granules; Phenol; Total antioxidant capacity (TAC); Drought and salinity; Tibetan wild barley (Hordeum vulgare L. ssp spontaneum)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171488]
  2. National 863 Program [2012AA101105]
  3. Key Research Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province of China [2012C12902-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Grain phytochemical profiles were compared in Tibetan wild barley XZ5 (drought-tolerant), XZ16 (salinity/aluminum-tolerant) and cv CM72 (salinity-tolerant) in response to drought and salinity alone and combination (D + S) during anthesis. Total antioxidant capacity assessed by determining ferric-reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP) in grains increased significantly as follows: D + S > drought > salinity, and XZ5 > XZ16 > CM72. A marked increase in the total phenol (TP) from individual and combined stresses was observed in XZ5, while a decrease occurred in CM72. Moreover, the activity of alpha-/beta-amylase in the grains under combined stress was 81.8%/16.9% in XZ5 and 48.6%/18.7% in XZ16 higher than that of CM72. Increases in amino acids, protein content and protein fractions of albumin, globulin, hordein and glutelin were maximised under D + S, with larger values in the Tibetan wild genotypes. Observation with a scanning electron microscopy showed a distinct genotypic difference under D + S; for example, XZ5 and XZ16 maintained a relatively integral starch granule with a greater protein deposit/matrix, while CM72 degraded by pitting. This research expands our understanding of barley drought and salt-tolerance mechanisms and provides possibility of Tibetan wild barley in developing barley cultivars with both tolerance to drought and salinity. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available