4.7 Article

Formation of damascenone derived from glycosidically bound precursors in green tea infusions

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 601-606

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.077

Keywords

Damascenone; Green tea; Glycosides; Precursor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Damascenone is well-known for its potent flavour with an extremely low odour threshold. Several glycosidically bound precursors of damascenone have been isolated from several plants, but little is known about their occurrences in green tea infusions. In this work, three major glycosidic precursors of damascenone, 9-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-megastigma-6,7-dien-3,5.9-triol (1a), 9-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-3-hydroxy-7,8-didehydro-beta-ionol (2a), and 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-3-hydroxy-7,8-didehydro-beta-ionol (2b) were isolated and identified in green tea infusions, and the stereochemistries at C-3 and C-9 positions of aglycone parts of the three glycosidic precursors were determined as (3S, 9R)-1a, (3R, 9R)-2a, and (3R, 9R)-2b, respectively. Compounds 1a, 2a, and 2b as well as 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-megastigma-6,7-dien-3,5,9-triol (1b) were hydrolysed to form damascenone in a model system with strong acidic conditions (pH 2.0) and at high temperature (90 degrees C). In contrast to hydrolysis of 2a and 2b, more damascenone was transformed from la and 1b. Furthermore, the beta-D-glucosyl moiety at the C-3 position gave a higher dehydration rate from megastigma-6,7-dien-3,5,9-triol to 3-hydroxy-7,8-didehydro-beta-ionol than compound 1a carrying the sugar residue at C-9 position. Interestingly, the four glycosidic precursors of damascenone were not hydrolysed to give damascenone under slightly acidic conditions (pH 5.4 and 120 degrees C for 10 min), but they could be transformed to damascenone in the presence of green tea infusions even under the equal conditions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available