4.7 Article

Bioactivities of low-grade green coffee and spent coffee in different in vitro model systems

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 79-85

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.063

Keywords

Low-grade coffee; Spent coffee; Radical scavenging activity; ORAC; Anti-tumour; Anti-inflammatory; Anti-allergy

Funding

  1. Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore and Head, Plantation Products Spices and Flavour Technology Department CFTRI, Mysore
  2. United Nations University-Kirin (Tokyo, Japan)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methanolic extracts of low-grade green coffee (LCB) and spent coffee were analysed for radical-scavenging activity (alpha,alpha-diphenyl-beta-picrylhydrazyl radical) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC). The extracts were also evaluated for anti-tumour (P388 cell assay), anti-inflammatory (J774A.1 cell assay) and anti-allergenic (RBL-2H3 cell line) activities in vitro. LCB extract was found to exhibit a radical-scavenging activity of 92.0% followed by spent Arabica (86.9%) and spent Robusta (82.0%) at a concentration of 50 ppm. The antioxidant activity of LCB extract. measured as Trolox equivalents (4416 mu M/g) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of the spent coffee extracts. However, extracts of spent coffee exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) more anti-tumour activity than the LCB extract in terms of cell viability. This could lie due to the possible role of brown pigments (melanoidins and phenolic polymers). formed during roasting, which may protect cells from oxidative damage in the biological system. However, both the extracts of LCB and spent coffee showed limited anti inflammatory and anti-allergic activity. The presence of phenolics and chlorogenic acids in appreciable quantities along with brown pigments makes these coffee by-products a source for natural antioxidants. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available