4.7 Review

Sub-critical water treatment of rice bran to produce valuable materials

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 1-7

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.099

Keywords

Sub-critical water; Rice bran; Biomass; Hydrolysis; Oil extraction; Total nitrogen; Total sugar

Funding

  1. ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. 21st Century COE program (E19, Science and Engineering for Water

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The target of this study is application of sub-critical water as a green solvent for hydrolysis of rice bran and extraction of its oil in order to obtain value-added materials. Experiments were carried out at temperatures ranging from 100 to 360 degrees C with 5 min residence time in a batch reactor. Four phases were isolated after reaction: hexane-soluble, acetone-soluble, water-soluble, and solid residue phases. Rice bran oil was successfully and efficiently obtained by sub-critical water extraction. Significant increases of total organic carbon (Toc) and total nitrogen (TN) in the water phase were also observed, because polysaccharides and proteins (generally bio-macro polymers) in rice bran were hydrolysed by sub-critical water. The highest yields of TOC and TN were 140 and 13 mg/g dry matter, respectively. As a result, varieties of compounds, such as amino acids, organic acids, and water-soluble saccharides, were identified in the water phase. In particular, significant amounts of water-soluble sugars (maximum yield of total sugars was nearly 190 mg/g dry matter) proved that sub-critical water was a promising medium for dissolution of biomass in water. Acetone-soluble contents were attributed to tar, carbonized biomass, and in general, water and hexane-insoluble compounds. Solid residue consisted of mainly tin-reacted rice bran and insoluble inorganic compounds. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available