4.7 Article

Determination of patulin in apple and quince products by GC-MS using 13C5-7 patulin as internal standard

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 352-359

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.074

Keywords

Patulin; Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS); Apple products; Quince jam; PCR; Penicillium expansum

Funding

  1. Subprograma Ciencia e Tecnologia do 3degrees Quadro Comunitirio de Apoio [SFRH/BPD/41854/2007, SFRH/BPD/20725/2004]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/20725/2004] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A reliable gas chromatographic mass spectrometric method has been validated for the determination of trace levels (<10 mu gL(-1)) of patulin in apple products and quince jam. The method was based on extraction of patulin with ethyl acetate-hexane, alkalinisation and silylation with N,O-bis-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide with 1% of trimethylchloro-silane. The accurate determination of patulin was achieved by employing commercial C-13(5-7) patulin labelled as an internal standard, which allowed compensating target analyte losses and enhancement or suppression matrix effects. Limits of detection and quantification of method using real samples were 0.4 and 1.6 mu gkg(-1), respectively. Recoveries of patulin from samples spiked at 8-50 mu gkg(-1) levels ranged between 71% and 89%. The repeatability of measurements (expressed as relative standard deviation) was lower than 16%. The method was successfully applied to the determination of patulin in apple fruit and apple products including Juice, cider and baby food, and also in quince fruit and quince jam. A new PCR system for the detection of Penicillium expansum in samples containing highly degraded DNA was developed which permitted the detection of the mould in 2/3 of the samples containing patulin, including juices and jams. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available