4.7 Article

Simple and high-throughput method for the multimycotoxin analysis in cereals and related foods by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages 705-712

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.045

Keywords

Mycotoxins; Food analysis; Ultra-high performance liquid; chromatography; Tandem mass spectrometry; Sample throughput

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (MEC-FEDER) [AGL2006-12127-CO201]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science-EFS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid, reliable and sensitive method was developed to determine 12 mycotoxins (deoxynivalenol, aflatoxins B1, B2, G1, G2 and M1, fumonisins B1 and B2, ochratoxin A, HT-2 and T-2 toxin and zearalenone) simultaneously in maize, walnuts, biscuits and breakfast cereals. The method is based on a single extraction step using acetonitrile/water mixture (80/20 v/v) followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The selectivity of the MS/MS detection allowed the elimination of further clean up steps. Extraction, chromatographic and detection conditions were optimised in order to increase sample throughput and sensitivity. Matrix-matched calibration was used for quantification and recoveries of the extraction process ranged from 70.0% and 108.41%, with relative standard deviations lower than 25% in all the cases, when samples were fortified at 5 and 50 mu g/kg. Limits of detection ranged from 0.01 to 2.1 mu g/kg and limits of quantification ranged from 0.03 to 6.30 mu g/kg, which were always below the tolerance levels of mycotoxins set by European Union in the matrices evaluated. Several samples were analysed and aflatoxins 131, B2, G1, G2 and T-2 toxin were detected in one maize sample, with concentrations lower than 6.0 mu g/kg and deoxynivalenol was detected in a breakfast cereal at 42.1 mu g/kg. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available