4.6 Review

Methods for biological data integration: perspectives and challenges

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 12, Issue 112, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0571

Keywords

data fusion; biological networks; non-negative matrix factorization; systems biology; omics data; heterogeneous data integration

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [278212]
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation (CDI) [OIA-1028394]
  3. Serbian Ministry of Education and Science Project [III44006]
  4. ARRS [J1-5454]
  5. Office of Integrative Activities
  6. Office Of The Director [1028394] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid technological advances have led to the production of different types of biological data and enabled construction of complex networks with various types of interactions between diverse biological entities. Standard network data analysis methods were shown to be limited in dealing with such heterogeneous networked data and consequently, new methods for integrative data analyses have been proposed. The integrative methods can collectively mine multiple types of biological data and produce more holistic, systems-level biological insights. We survey recent methods for collective mining (integration) of various types of networked biological data. We compare different state-of-the-art methods for data integration and highlight their advantages and disadvantages in addressing important biological problems. We identify the important computational challenges of these methods and provide a general guideline for which methods are suited for specific biological problems, or specific data types. Moreover, we propose that recent non-negative matrix factorization-based approaches may become the integration methodology of choice, as they are well suited and accurate in dealing with heterogeneous data and have many opportunities for further development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available