4.6 Article

Punctuated equilibrium in the large-scale evolution of programming languages

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 12, Issue 107, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0249

Keywords

cultural evolution; punctuated equilibrium; networks; technology; programming languages; software

Funding

  1. Botin Foundation
  2. Banco Santander through its Santander Universities Global Division
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [FIS2013-44674-P]
  4. Santa Fe Institute
  5. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analogies and differences between biological and cultural evolution have been explored by evolutionary biologists, historians, engineers and linguists alike. Two well-known domains of cultural change are language and technology. Both share some traits relating the evolution of species, but technological change is very difficult to study. A major challenge in our way towards a scientific theory of technological evolution is how to properly define evolutionary trees or clades and how to weight the role played by horizontal transfer of information. Here, we study the large-scale historical development of programming languages, which have deeply marked social and technological advances in the last half century. We analyse their historical connections using network theory and reconstructed phylogenetic networks. Using both data analysis and network modelling, it is shown that their evolution is highly uneven, marked by innovation events where new languages are created out of improved combinations of different structural components belonging to previous languages. These radiation events occur in a bursty pattern and are tied to novel technological and social niches. The method can be extrapolated to other systems and consistently captures the major classes of languages and the widespread horizontal design exchanges, revealing a punctuated evolutionary path.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available