4.6 Article

Big city, small world: density, contact rates, and transmission of dengue across Pakistan

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE
Volume 12, Issue 111, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0468

Keywords

dengue; epidemiology; heterogeneity; mixing; spatial dynamics; spatial accessibility

Funding

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  2. RAPIDD programme of the Science and Technology Directorate
  3. Department of Homeland Security
  4. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  5. Wellcome Trust [095066]
  6. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1093011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macroscopic descriptions of populations commonly assume that encounters between individuals are well mixed; i.e. each individual has an equal chance of coming into contact with any other individual. Relaxing this assumption can be challenging though, due to the difficulty of acquiring detailed knowledge about the non-random nature of encounters. Here, we fitted a mathematical model of dengue virus transmission to spatial time-series data from Pakistan and compared maximum-likelihood estimates of 'mixing parameters' when disaggregating data across an urban-rural gradient. We show that dynamics across this gradient are subject not only to differing transmission intensities but also to differing strengths of nonlinearity due to differences in mixing. Accounting for differences in mobility by incorporating two fine-scale, density-dependent covariate layers eliminates differences in mixing but results in a doubling of the estimated transmission potential of the large urban district of Lahore. We furthermore show that neglecting spatial variation in mixing can lead to substantial underestimates of the level of effort needed to control a pathogen with vaccines or other interventions. We complement this analysis with estimates of the relationships between dengue transmission intensity and other putative environmental drivers thereof.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available