4.7 Article

Biochemical and biological assessment of the inhibitory potency of extracts from vinification byproducts of Vitis vinifera extracts against glycogen phosphorylase

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 35-43

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.055

Keywords

Glycogen metabolism; Bioactive polyphenols; Vinification byproducts; Glycogen phosphorylase; Type 2 diabetes; X-ray crystallography

Funding

  1. European Social Fund (ESF) and National Resources
  2. European Union (European Social Fund - ESF) and Greek national funds
  3. Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly
  4. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme under BioStruct-X [283570]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhibitory potency of thirteen polyphenolic extracts obtained from vinification byproducts of Greek varieties of Vitis vinifera against glycogen phosphorylase (GP) has been studied by kinetic experiments. GP is an enzyme involved in glucose homeostasis and a molecular target for the discovery of new hypoglycemic agents. Studies have shown that all extracts display significant inhibitory potency for GP in vitro with IC50 values in the range of low mu g/mL. X-ray crystallographic analysis of GP crystals soaked with two of these extracts revealed that the most active ingredient is quercetin which binds at novel binding site, distinct from the other known sites of the enzyme. One of the most potent of the studied extracts had also a moderate effect on glycogenolysis in the cellular lever with an IC50 value of 17.35 mu g/mL. These results highlight the importance of natural resources in the quest for the discovery of new hypoglycemic agents, while at the same time they can serve as the starting point for their exploitation for antidiabetic usage and the development of novel biofunctional foods. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available