4.7 Article

Detection of furan levels in select Chinese foods by solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method and dietary exposure estimation of furan in the Chinese population

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 34-40

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.012

Keywords

Furan; Solid phase microextraction (SPME); Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCMS); Chinese food; Exposure estimation

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB720805]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Project) [2011AA100806]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (SPMEGC/MS) method was developed to detection the levels of furan in 191 selected food products obtained from the Chinese markets. The performance of the analysis method was evaluated by some quality parameters such as limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), linearity, recovery, and runto-run (n = 6) and day-to-day (n = 18) precisions. The LOD and the LOQ of the method were 0.059 ng/g and 0.175 ng/g, respectively. The recovery of the method in fruit juice, canned jam, and infant formula ranged from 93.25% to 104.69%. The results from this study showed that furan was detected in almost all analyzed samples. Furan contents in different food samples varied greatly according to the raw materials and processing conditions. The higher contents of furan were detected in traditional Chinese liquor (61.63 ng/g), coffee (71.36 ng/g), tea (68.28 ng/g) and pickle (85.63 ng/g). The dietary intake of furan was estimated to be 0.093 mu g/kg b.w.t/day in adults and 0.333 mu g/kg b.w.t/day in infants at 6 months. Further studies are needed to reveal other sources of dietary furan exposure. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available