4.7 Article

Modulation of antioxidant defense system by the dithiocarbamate fungicides Maneb and Zineb in Chinese hamster V79 cells and the role of N-acetyl-L-cysteine

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue -, Pages 130-134

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.07.034

Keywords

Maneb; Zineb; Antioxidant enzymes; Oxidative stress; NAC

Funding

  1. Medical University of Warsaw, Poland [1WK/W2/2009, 1WK/N/2010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress is one of the major factors leading to Maneb- and Zineb-induced disorders. The aim of this in vitro study was to examine (i) the potency of Maneb and Zineb to induce changes in antioxidant enzyme activities in Chinese hamster fibroblasts V79 cells and (ii) the role of N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) in the preventing their action. Maneb increased mitochondrial superoxide dismutase (SOD2) activity but failed to affect the activity of cytoplasmic superoxide dismutase (SOD1), whereas Zineb did not change the activity of any of superoxide dismutases. The activity of catalase (CAT) was reduced only by Zineb. The activity of both glutathione peroxidases (non-Se-GPx, Se-GPx) and glutathione reductase (GR) was decreased after exposure to these agents. After NAC pre-treatment Maneb increased the activity of GR, whereas the activity of non-Se-GPx was decreased as compared to that in NAC-treated cells. On the other hand, the activity of both SODs and CAT was decreased. Zineb decreased the activity of both GPxs and SOD2 with a concomitant increase in CAT activity comparing to NAC-treated cells. The results obtained thus suggest that Zineb acts by another mechanism, than Maneb does, and that one of the mechanisms of NAC protection against Maneb or Zineb-induced effects in V79 cells is its impact on enzymatic defense. Activity of GR, SOD2, and GPxs are the most affected enzymes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available