4.7 Article

Protective effects of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) intake on experimental colon carcinogenesis

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 2902-2910

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.05.006

Keywords

Yacon root; Colon carcinogenesis; Cancer chemoprevention; Rat

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2009/12239-2, 2011/01126-2]
  2. CNPq [301585/2009-1]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [11/01126-2] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius), a tuberous root native to the Andean region of South America, contains high concentration of fructans with potential for colon cancer prevention. This study investigated the potential beneficial of yacon intake on colon carcinogenesis induced by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) in male Wistar rats. After 4 weeks of DMH-initiation, groups were fed basal diet (Cl and G6) or basal diet containing dried extract of yacon root at 0.5% (G2), 1.0% (G3 and G5) or a synbiotic formulation (G4) (1.0% yacon plus Lactobacillus casei at 2.5 x 10(10) CFU per g diet) for 13 weeks. At week 20, a significant reduction in number and multiplicity of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) and in number of invasive adenocarcinomas was observed in the groups orally treated with 1.0% yacon (G3) or the synbiotic formulation (G4) (0.05 < p < 0.001). Tumor multiplicity (noninvasive plus invasive) was significantly lower in the group fed synbiotic formulation (p < 0.02). A significant reduction in cell proliferation in colonic crypts and tumors and short chain fatty acids (SCFA) caecal contents was observed in the groups orally treated with 1.0% yacon (G3) or the synbiotic formulation (G4). Therefore, the findings this study indicate that yacon and yacon plus L casei intake may reduce the development of chemically-induced colon cancer. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available