4.2 Article

Patterns and severity of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 37-46

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jns.12114

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukemia; children; patterns; severity; vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy

Funding

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR001108, KL2 TR000446, UL1 TR000445, UL1 TR000433] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [K12 HD068371, R01 HD062484] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM099924] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vincristine, a critical component of combination chemotherapy treatment for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), can lead to vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN). Longitudinal VIPN assessments were obtained over 12 months from newly diagnosed children with ALL (N=128) aged 1-18 years who received vincristine at one of four academic children's hospitals. VIPN assessments were obtained using the Total Neuropathy Score-Pediatric Vincristine (TNS (c)-PV), National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE (c)), Balis (c) grading scale, and Pediatric Neuropathic Pain Scale (c)-Five (PNPS (c)-5). Of children who provided a full TNS (c)-PV score, 85/109 (78%) developed VIPN (TNS (c)-PV 4). Mean TNS (c)-PV, grading scale, and pain scores were low. CTCAE (c)-derived grades 3 and 4 sensory and motor VIPN occurred in 1.6%/0%, and 1.9%/0% of subjects, respectively. VIPN did not resolve in months 8-12 despite decreasing dose density. VIPN was worse in older children. Partition cluster analysis revealed 2-3 patient clusters; one cluster (n=14) experienced severe VIPN. In this population, VIPN occurs more commonly than previous research suggests, persists throughout the first year of treatment, and can be severe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available