4.2 Article

Genetic determinants of chronic oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity: a genome-wide study replication and meta-analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 15-23

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jns.12110

Keywords

chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; meta-analysis; neurotoxicity; oxaliplatin; polymorphisms

Funding

  1. Fondazione Cariplo [2013-0842]
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed at validating the role of genetic variants identified by a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) as determinants of chronic oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN). Eight polymorphisms (rs10486003, rs2338, rs843748, rs797519, rs4936453, rs12023000, rs17140129, and rs6924717) were genotyped in a total of 150 colorectal cancer patients of Caucasian origin receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The severity grade of chronic OXAIPN was assessed by NCI-CTC criteria and the clinical version of the Total Neuropathy Score((c)) (TNSc (c)). None of the polymorphisms investigated was found associated with grade 2 chronic OXAIPN (NCI-CTC criteria), while a nominal association emerged for ACYP2 rs843748 when using the TNSc (c) scale (dominant model: odds ratio [OR]: 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.75, P=0.008). In the combined analysis of this results with data of the two previously published studies which assessed chronic OXAIPN by NCI-CTC criteria, evidence suggestive of association with chronic OXAIPN (NCI-CTC criteria) was found for ACYP2 rs843748 (dominant model: OR: 2.40, 95%CI: 1.40-5.24, P=0.027), which, however, did not remain significant after correction for multiple testing (threshold P-value <0.00625). These findings suggest a minor role of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) investigated as genetic determinants of chronic OXAIPN. These results also highlight the importance of replication studies with meta-analysis for validation of GWAS findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available