4.2 Article

MFN2 deletion of exons 7 and 8: founder mutation in the UK population

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 67-71

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jns.12117

Keywords

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; inherited neuropathy; mitofusin 2

Funding

  1. MRC [G108/638, G0601943, G1001253, MR/J004758/1, G0802760, MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G0601943, G1001253, MR/J004758/1, G108/638, MR/K000608/1, G0802760] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/J004758/1, G1001253, MR/K000608/1, G0802760, G108/638, G0601943] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [1U54 NS065712-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitofusin 2 (MFN2) mutations are the most common cause of axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT2). The majority are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner but recessive and semi-dominant kindreds have also been described. We previously reported a deletion of exons 7 and 8 resulting in nonsense-mediated decay, segregating with disease when present in trans with another pathogenic MFN2 mutation. Detailed clinical and electrophysiological data on a series of five affected patients from four kindreds and, when available, their parents and relatives were collected. MFN2 Sanger sequencing, multiplex ligation probe amplification, and haplotype analysis were performed. A severe early-onset CMT phenotype was seen in all cases: progressive distal weakness, wasting, and sensory loss from infancy or early childhood. Optic atrophy (four of five) and wheelchair dependency in childhood were common (four of five). All were compound heterozygous for a deletion of exons 7 and 8 in MFN2 with another previously reported pathogenic mutation (Phe216Ser, Thr362Met, and Arg707Trp). Carrier parents and relatives were unaffected (age range: 24-82 years). Haplotype analysis confirmed that the deletion had a common founder in all families.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available