4.7 Article

Antioxidant activities of major thyme ingredients and lack of (oxidative) DNA damage in V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells at low levels of carvacrol and thymol

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 2037-2043

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.05.020

Keywords

Thymol; Carvacrol; gamma-Terpinene; Comet assay; Reactive oxygen species; Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity

Funding

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)
  2. Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft (DFG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The leafy parts of thyme and its essential oil have been used in foods for the flavour, aroma and preservation and also in folk medicines. In the present study the genotoxicity of thymol and carvacrol was examined using comet assay. In V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells treated with 1, 5, 25 mu M thymol and carvacrol, only 25 mu M thymol caused some clastogenic DNA damage. For detection of oxidative DNA damage, the comet assay with formamido pyrimidine glycosylase (Fpg) protein was used: When V79 cells were treated with 1, 5, 25 mu M thymol and carvacrol and post-treated with Fpg enzyme, no significant increase of Fpg-sensitive sites was observed at all concentrations studied. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation decreased slightly in the presence of thymol (1-100 mu M) and carvacrol (5 mu M) between I and 4 h, yet increased at the highest 100 mu M concentration of carvacrol after 24 h. Thymol and carvacrol displayed a concentration dependent antioxidant capacity, whilst gamma-terpinene which lacks a phenolic group did not show any antioxidant capacity in the trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay. The results of this study indicate a lack of clastogenic activity for thymol and carvacrol at biologically relevant concentrations, and a moderate antioxidant activity in vitro. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available