4.7 Article

Effects of borneol on the level of DNA damage induced in primary rat hepatocytes and testicular cells by hydrogen peroxide

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 1318-1323

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.03.002

Keywords

Borneol; Primary rat hepatocytes; Testicular cells; Comet assay; Hydrogen peroxide; Genotoxicity

Funding

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV 51-015404]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of Slovak Republic and the Academy of Sciences [VEGA 2/0072/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this paper was to evaluate genotoxic effects of borneol and its ability to change DNA-damaging effects of H2O2 in rat hepatocytes and testicular cells. Both in vitro and ex vivo approaches were used in the case of hepatocytes. Testicular cells were tested only ex vivo, i.e. shortly after isolation from rats supplemented by borneol. Cytotoxicity of borneol increased in in vitro conditions in a concentration-dependent manner and it was associated with DNA-damaging effects at toxic concentrations. While non-toxic concentrations of borneol applied in vitro protected cells against H2O2-induced DNA damage and interfered only partly with rejoining of H2O2-induced DNA strand breaks, cytotoxic concentrations of borneol manifested synergy with H2O2, i.e. enhanced DNA-damaging effects of H2O2. On the other side, borneol given to rats in drinking water decreased the level of DNA damage induced by H2O2 in both hepatocytes and testicular cells. Our results show that though at higher concentrations (2-h treatment with >2 mM borneol >0.3084 mg/ml) borneol acts cytotoxically and genotoxically on primary hepatocytes cultured in vitro, if given to rats during 7 days in a daily concentration of 17.14 or 34.28 mg/kg it reduces genotoxicity of H2O2 in both hepatocytes and testicular cells. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available