4.7 Article

Malathion-induced testicular toxicity in male rats and the protective effect of vitamins C and E

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 1903-1908

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.05.001

Keywords

Organophosphate insecticide; Malathion; Testicular toxicity; Histopathology; Vitamin C; Vitamin E

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sexually mature male Wistar rats (weighing 300-320 g and each group 6 animals) were given malathion (27 mg/kg; 1/50 of the LD50 for an oral dose) and/or vitamin C (200 mg/kg) + vitamin E (200 mg/kg) daily via gavage for 4 weeks. The sperm counts, sperm motility, sperm morphology, FSH, LH, and testosterone levels, and histopathological changes in the testes of these rats, were investigated at the end of the 4th week. By the end of 4th week, rats given malathion alone, or in combination with vitamins C and E, had significantly lower sperm counts and sperm motility, and significantly higher abnormal sperm numbers, than the untreated control rats. The rats given malathion alone or in combination with vitamins also had significantly lower plasma FSH, LH and testosterone levels than the control rats. Co-treatment of malathion-exposed rats with vitamins E and C had a protective effect on sperm counts, sperm motility and abnormal sperm numbers, but not on plasma FSH, LH and testosterone levels. Light microscopic investigations revealed that 4 weeks of malathion exposure was associated with necrosis and edema in the seminiferous tubules and interstitial tissues. Degenerative changes in the seminiferous tubules were also observed in the rats which received malathion and supplemented with vitamins C and E, but milder histopathological changes were observed in the interstitial tissues. Thus, it appears that vitamins C and E ameliorate malathion testicular toxicity but are not completely protective. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available