4.7 Article

Speciation and separation of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) using coprecipitation with Ni2+/2-Nitroso-1-naphthol-4-sulfonic acid and determination by FAAS in water and food samples

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 2601-2605

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.07.020

Keywords

Chromium speciation; Coprecipitation; Ni2+/2-Nitroso-1-naphthol-4-sulfonic acid; FAAS; Food samples

Funding

  1. Unit of the Scientific Research Projects of Gaziosmanpasa University
  2. Unit of the Scientific Research Projects of Erciyes University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A speciation procedure for chromium(III) and chromium(VI) in the water and food samples has been established in the presented work. The procedure presented based on quantitative recoveries of Cr(III) > 95% using coprecipitation of Ni2+/2-Nitroso-1-naphthol-4-sulfonic acid. The total chromium was measured after reduction of Cr(VI) by concentrated H2SO4 and ethanol. The Cr(VI) was calculated as the difference between the total Cr content and the Cr(III) contents. The analytical variables, pH, amounts of precipitate, sample volume for optimum recoveries of Cr(III) were investigated. The influences of the some alkaline and earth alkaline ions and some transition metals on the recoveries of analyte ions were also investigated. The preconcentration factor was 50. The detection limit (3 sigma) of the reagent blank for chromium(III) was 1.33 mu g L-1. The relative standard deviations for determinations were found to be <7%, and % of relative error was calculated <6%. The method was validated by certified reference materials of tea (GBW 07605) and bush branches and leaves (GBW 0703). The procedure was successfully applied to the speciation of chromium in natural water and food samples (fish, white cheese, cow's meat, black tea, boiled wheat). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available