4.5 Article

Quality optimisation of combined osmotic dehydration and microwave assisted air drying of pineapple using constant power emission

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPRODUCTS PROCESSING
Volume 90, Issue C2, Pages 171-179

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2011.02.006

Keywords

Combined technologies; Drying rate; Microwave drying; Osmotic dehydration; Overheating

Funding

  1. European Commission [INCO-DEV/ICA4-2001-10047]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Combination of osmotic dehydration with microwave assisted air drying offers increased flexibility for process control and product quality. Osmotic dehydration (55 degrees Brix solution at 40 degrees C for 90 min) combined with microwave assisted air drying (MWAD) wits tested on smooth cayenne pineapples. The influence of the four most relevant processing parameters (osmotic treatment time, microwave power, air temperature and air velocity) was studied using a 24 circumscribed central composite experimental design. The product quality was evaluated in terms of charred appearance at the surface, moisture content, soluble solids content, water activity, firmness, colour and volume. microwave power and air temperature were the two most important processing parameters that influenced the quality of the dehydrated pineapple, with the parameters most affected by the operating conditions being water content and percentage of charred pieces. Only in the latter was a significant quadratic effect found, all others were approximately linear. There was also a significant interactive effect between microwave power and air temperature affecting the percentage of charred pieces. Model predictions using a quadratic surface for water content and % charred pieces were validated with an additional experiment. Quadratic models were used to indicate optimum drying conditions for various targets. (C) 2011 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available