4.7 Review

Edible and Biodegradable Starch Films: A Review

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 2058-2076

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-012-0835-4

Keywords

Biopolymer; Crystallinity; Film formation; Casting

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [AGL2010-20694]
  2. FEDER founds
  3. Conselleria de Educacio de la Comunitat Valenciana
  4. Campus de Excelencia Internacional VLC/CAMPUS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mainly due to environmental aims, petroleum-based plastics are being replaced by natural polymers. In the last decades, starch has been evaluated in its film-forming ability for applications in the food packaging area. Characteristics of the starch film matrices, the film formation methods, and physicochemical properties of the starch films are reviewed in this paper. The influences of different components added in casting methods and thermoplastic processes have been also analyzed. Comparison of mechanical properties of newly prepared starch films and stored films reveals that the recrystallization phenomenon made the films more rigid and less stretchable. These effects can be inhibited by adding other polymers to the starch matrix. Other approaches to improve the starch films' properties are the reinforcement by adding organic or inorganic fillers to the starch matrix as well as the addition of functional compounds. In this way starch films have improved mechanical and barrier properties and can act as a bioactive packaging. Physicochemical properties of the starch films showed a great variability depending on the compounds added to the matrix and the processing method. Nevertheless, dry methods are more recommendable for film manufacturing because of the greater feasibility of the industrial process. In this sense, a better understanding of the nano and microstructural changes occurring in the matrices and their impact on the film properties is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available