4.7 Article

Raisin Quality Classification Using Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM) Based on Combined Color and Texture Features

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages 1552-1563

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-011-0531-9

Keywords

Raisin; Classification; Color features; Texture features; Least squares support vector machine

Funding

  1. 863 National High-Tech Research and Development Plan [2007AA10Z210]
  2. National Agricultural Science and Technology Achievements Transformation Fund Programs [2009 GB23600517]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Z3090295]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [10831007]
  5. Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of China [2010A610015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, an approach based on combined color and texture features to classify raisins is presented. Least squares support vector machine (LSSVM), linear discriminant analysis, and soft independent modeling of class analogy were used to construct classification models. A total of 480 images were captured from four grades of raisin samples by a Basler 601 fc IEEE1394 digital camera, 200 images were randomly selected to create calibration model (training set), and remaining images were used to verify the model (prediction set). Color features and texture features were obtained from two color spaces: red-green-blue and hue-saturation-intensity using histogram method and gray level co-occurrence matrix method, respectively. Our results indicate that the best performance with about 95% of average correct answer rate is achieved by LSSVM using combined color and texture features from HSI color space. This result is significantly higher than the performance of solely used color or texture features. The combined color and texture features coupled with a LSSVM classifier are a highly accurate way for raisin quality classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available