4.7 Review

Advances in Machine Vision Applications for Automatic Inspection and Quality Evaluation of Fruits and Vegetables

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 487-504

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-010-0411-8

Keywords

Computer vision; Image analysis; Fruits and vegetables; Automatic inspection; Internal quality; Hyperspectral; In-line grading

Funding

  1. Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria de Espana (INIA) [RTA2009-00118-C02-01]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion de Espana (MICINN) [DPI2010-19457]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Artificial vision systems are powerful tools for the automatic inspection of fruits and vegetables. Typical target applications of such systems include grading, quality estimation from external parameters or internal features, monitoring of fruit processes during storage or evaluation of experimental treatments. The capabilities of an artificial vision system go beyond the limited human capacity to evaluate long-term processes objectively or to appreciate events that take place outside the visible electromagnetic spectrum. Use of the ultraviolet or near-infrared spectra makes it possible to explore defects or features that the human eye is unable to see. Hyperspectral systems provide information about individual components or damage that can be perceived only at particular wavelengths and can be used as a tool to develop new computer vision systems adapted to particular objectives. In-line grading systems allow huge amounts of fruit or vegetables to be inspected individually and provide statistics about the batch. In general, artificial systems not only substitute human inspection but also improve on its capabilities. This work presents the latest developments in the application of this technology to the inspection of the internal and external quality of fruits and vegetables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available