4.7 Article

Visible/Near-Infrared Spectra for Linear and Nonlinear Calibrations: A Case to Predict Soluble Solids Contents and pH Value in Peach

Journal

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 1376-1383

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-009-0227-6

Keywords

Vis/NIR spectroscopy; Peach; Soluble solids content (SSC); Partial least squares (PLS); Independent component analysis (ICA); Least squares-support vector machine (LS-SVM)

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Support Program [2006BAD10A04]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [30671213]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang [Y307158]
  4. Science and Technology Department of Ningbo [2008C10037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two sensitive wavelength (SWs) selection methods combined with visible/near-infrared (Vis/NIR) spectroscopy were investigated to determine the soluble solids content (SSC) and pH value in peaches, including latent variables analysis (LVA) and independent component analysis (ICA). A total of 100 samples were prepared for the calibration (n = 70) and prediction (n = 30) sets. Calibration models using SWs selected by LVA and ICA were developed, including linear regression of partial least squares (PLS) analysis and nonlinear regression of least squares-support vector machine (LS-SVM). In the nonlinear models, four SWs selected by ICA achieved the optimal ICA-LS-SVM model compared with LV-LS-SVM and both of them better than linear model of PLS. The correlation coefficients (r(p) and r(cv)), root mean square error of cross validation, root mean square error of prediction, and bias by ICA-LS-SVM were 0.9537, 0.9485, 0.4231, 0.4155, and 0.0167 for SSC and 0.9638, 0.9657, 0.0472, 0.0497, and -0.0082 for pH value, respectively. The overall results indicated that ICA was a powerful way for the selection of SWs, and Vis/NIR spectroscopy incorporated to ICA-LS-SVM was successful for the accurate determination of SSC and pH value in peach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available