4.4 Article

LT-RADE: An Efficient User-Friendly Genome Walking Method Applied to the Molecular Characterization of the Insertion Site of Genetically Modified Maize MON810 and Rice LLRICE62

Journal

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 705-713

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-012-9438-y

Keywords

Genome walking; Long template PCR (LTPCR); RADE; LT-RADE; Polymerase; Insertion site; MON810; LLRICE62

Funding

  1. European Commission Joint Research Centre
  2. European Union Reference Laboratory for GM Food & Feed (EURL-GMFF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Information on the insertion site and characterization of the transgene(s) in genetically modified organisms (GMO) is very important for safety assessment and identification of a GMO. The generation of such information in general and in particular in emergencies or rapid alert situations involving GMO greatly benefit from the availability of simple, efficient, and rapid approaches. Here, we report on the improvement of a restriction independent method named Rapid Amplification of genomic DNA Ends (RADE). The method was developed using maize event MON810 genomic DNA as a model system, testing a standard Taq polymerase or a blend of polymerases (standard Taq and proofreading Tgo polymerases (LT-RADE)). Both methods produce an initial single strand DNA, followed by nested PCR steps and yield easy-to-isolate DNA fragments for further manipulation. We showed that the application of the Taq/Tgo polymerase blend significantly increased the size of the obtained PCR products. Using LT-RADE, we could successfully isolate the flanking regions of the transgenic insert of the GM maize event MON810 and confirmed the existing data on the adjacent regions of the insert. In addition, application of our approach allowed to efficiently isolate and identify, for the first time, the DNA sequences surrounding the insert of GM rice event LLRICE62.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available