4.4 Article

A Rapid and Simple DNA Extraction Procedure to Detect Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes from Fresh Produce Using Real-time PCR

Journal

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 96-101

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-008-9032-5

Keywords

Pathogen Detection; Food-borne; Food Safety; Fresh Produce; Food Microbiology

Funding

  1. School of Life Sciences and Chemical Technology
  2. Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA isolation procedures significantly influence the outcome of PCR-based detection of human pathogens. Unlike clinical samples, DNA isolation from food samples, particularly from fresh and fresh-cut produce has remained a formidable task and has hampered the sensitivity and accuracy of molecular methods. We utilized a commercially available filter-based DNA isolation method (FTA) in conjunction with real-time PCR-based detection of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes. The protocol uses filter paper discs impregnated with a patented chemical formulation that lyses cells, immobilizes DNA, and protects it from degradation. Use of the FTA method in conjunction with real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella spp. and L. monocytogenes was compared with two commercially available DNA isolation procedures that are commonly used for high throughput real-time PCR pathogen detection systems. Both pathogens were successfully detected from artificially inoculated fresh and fresh-cut produce such as alfalfa sprouts, cilantro, green onion, broccoli, prepacked mixed salad, and spinach at low cell numbers (four to seven colony forming units per 25 g initial inoculum level before enrichment). The FTA protocol had distinct advantages of simplicity, biosafety, and compatibility for high throughput screening. This DNA preparation protocol was rapid, sensitive, required minimal handling, and reduced interference from produce-associated inhibitors of real-time PCR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available