4.4 Article

Analysis of pesticide residues in strawberries and soils by GC-MS/MS,LC-MS/MS and twodimensional GC-time-of-flight MS comparing organic and integrated pest management farming

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2013.865842

Keywords

pesticide residue confirmatory analysis; chromatography; mass spectrometry; QuEChERS; strawberry; soil; farming practices

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [BD/47200/2008]
  2. POPH/FSE (Programa Operacional Potencial Humano/Fundo Social Europeu)
  3. [PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PEst-C/EQB/LA0006/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analysed 22 strawberry and soil samples after their collection over the course of 2years to compare the residue profiles from organic farming with integrated pest management practices in Portugal. For sample preparation, we used the citrate-buffered version of the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe (QuEChERS) method. We applied three different methods for analysis: (1) 27 pesticides were targeted using LC-MS/MS; (2) 143 were targeted using low pressure GC-tandem mass spectrometry (LP-GC-MS/MS); and (3) more than 600 pesticides were screened in a targeted and untargeted approach using comprehensive, two-dimensional gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GCxGC-TOF-MS). Comparison was made of the analyses using the different methods for the shared samples. The results were similar, thereby providing satisfactory confirmation of both similarly positive and negative findings. No pesticides were found in the organic-farmed samples. In samples from integrated pest management practices, nine pesticides were determined and confirmed to be present, ranging from 2 mu gkg(-1) for fluazifop-p-butyl to 50 mu gkg(-1) for fenpropathrin. Concentrations of residues in strawberries were less than European maximum residue limits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available