Journal
FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 363-371Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02652030802406219
Keywords
deoxynivalenol; zearalenone; fumonisins; nivalenol; cleaning; maize
Funding
- UK DEFRA
- Food Quality and Safety LINK Programme
- UK Food Standards Agency
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examined a total of 82 consignments of French and Argentinean raw maize as received at maize mills in the UK between 2004 and 2007. Samples were analysed for deoxynivalenol (DON), nivalenol (NIV), other trichothecenes, zearalenone (ZON), and fumonisins B1, B2, and B3 (FB1, FB2, and FB3) using fully validated analytical methods with limits of quantification of 10 g kg-1 for DON, NIV, and each fumonisin mycotoxin and 3 g kg-1 for ZON. All samples except two containing fumonisins met the European Commission statutory maximum permissible levels for DON, ZON, and FB1 + FB2 as operating in 2007. The maximum concentrations found for DON, NIV, ZON, and FB1 + FB2 were 444, 496, 165 and 5002 g kg-1, respectively. Fumonisins were detected in almost every sample with 65% of Argentinean maize containing more than 1000 g kg-1 of FB1 + FB2. In contrast, ZON was not detectable in almost 50% of consignments. During this period there was a distinct difference in mycotoxin concentrations between harvests and geographic origin. Flint maize from Argentina usually contained lower concentrations of DON and related trichothecenes and higher levels of fumonisins than maize from France, although concentrations of fumonisins up to 2000 g kg-1 or greater occurred in samples from both regions. The incidence and concentrations of fumonisins were similar to those in a similar previous survey, while zearalenone concentrations were lower. The distribution of mycotoxins in multi-hold ships was also investigated showing that fumonisins were much more evenly distributed than DON, thus indicating their general level in the ship as a whole. The effect of cleaning regimes was found to be very variable, especially for DON, ranging from no removal of mycotoxins to greater than 50% in some instances, but was not related to concentration. Evidence here suggests that while cleaning is essential for removing foreign bodies before milling, it cannot be used as a reliable tool for reducing mycotoxins.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available